Media one hundred Vs Ultimate Lower Professional

I have used Media one hundred because model 1 (early 1990s) and despite the fact that it was quite shaky in individuals revolutionary days I have usually liked its distinct and easy perform flow – and its photo good quality. Although it was less costly than Avid in these early days its image good quality was real “on line’ high quality. Since then I have upgraded every single handful of a long time and noticed the balance increase and extra features included.

However most video editors look to use Closing Minimize Professional and I have appear under rising force from colleagues to shift throughout to it. As it transpired I currently had it on the shelf as a couple of several years back Apple stopped promoting DVD Studio Professional as a stand by yourself system. I essential DVD Studio Professional so I had to get the bundle which took place to incorporate FCP.

Well, I managed to resist producing the leap till not too long ago, when I started utilizing the new breed of tape-much less cameras. My 1st encounter was the a lot acclaimed Sony EX3, which was employed for a video clip for the charity ARCOS. The only way I could get its documents into M100 was by upgrading to the most recent model of FCP and then using Sony’s Clip Browser and Clip Transfer application. That worked good but then, for a new documentary generation, I had footage from the Canon XF103, yet another really common digicam. This time the only way I could get the materials into M100 was to import it all into FCP 1st and then export it out again – a complete squander of time. I contacted M100 support and they proposed some 3rd get together application which was not only quite costly but also necessary some tortuous navigation to track down every single shot inside a multitude of folders. By this time I was fully cheesed off with Media a hundred and made the decision to give FCP a attempt.

It was naturally a steep learning curve but with the help documents I was ready to get the cling of it fairly rapidly. Some of the features of FCP are greater than M100, its colour grading for case in point, but I shortly discovered I experienced shuddered to a halt and the aid documents were no assist. Importing files from the Flash card is rapid and straightforward – all your pictures are there all set to edit. But they all have two sound tracks, even the mute shots. Ok, no issue, in M100 you just decide on the clip and change off the tracks you will not need to have ahead of dragging it to the timeline. Simple! But in FCP (I identified by Googling the issue) you have to make a copy of a clip before you can eliminate its seem tracks and then only by putting it in a “sequence” or timeline 1st and then dragging it back to the bin. It functions but it truly is fiddly.

Audio mixing is a bit fussy way too. True, FCP offers you finer management but you have to simply click on the clip 1st then modify the ranges in the editor. Media one hundred offers with it all in the timeline and is totally intuitive – and rapidly! With Media one hundred I generally edit in the timeline and I find it extremely surefooted and fast. You have a distinct picture of what you have doing with all the tracks at a look – not so with FCP.

But the most annoying factor of using FCP for me came when I place all my sequences collectively in 1 master plan. Clips that experienced performed properly in the quick sequence now introduced that they “Need to have RENDERING”. Fair ample I click Render All. Nothing. So I finally get them to render by demo and error. But why? Just www.pixelfilmstudios.com was not sitting, tapping his fingers ready to see the very first reduce. I’m confident several of the difficulties I had ended up simply because I am a novice with FCP but returning to Media 100 afterwards was pure pleasure!